Monday, October 11, 2004

New York Post Dating: Quality Matters

Last week,
baby-faced financier/comedian Sean, 28, picked trainee lawyer, Kelly, 25


Nice! My pick goes exactly as I saw it. In a rare match of all that makes sense, Kelly was the poll leader, Sean picked Kelly for the date, Sean thought Kelly was the bee's knees, and Kelly found someone she considers "a friend". That means Sean's going to be in therapy quite soon.



MEET Ilisa, 26,
an editorial assistant and triplet
.


Yeah, but guys, the other two are taken, so settle down. Ilisa might be a bit flaky - dates a lot of guys, likes cheesy music and dancing. Because I'm generous with giving the benefit of the doubt, we'll say she's a nice girl - nice enough to not be a problem on a date. It's probably true that she hasn't yet met the right guy. And she still might not yet:


Nick, 36?!?! Cradle robber! Or just a poorly paired match. Better luck next time, Nick.


Rafael comes through with a cheesy line on the animal question ("because I have foxy eyes") but generally looks like chick bait. He vaguely matches well with Ilisa. They might find chemistry or common ground on a date.


Francisco is competition, though. He seems like the type of guy who... well, you can't walk 5 feet in New York without bumping into them! Again, he vaguely matches well with Ilisa... except he likes dancing! And so does she! A match made in heaven! Regardless, if he IS like all the other guys in New York, it means that he's no good... and why do I get the feeling that the Post doesn't exactly go for all the Boy Scouts out there...


Well, I think Rafael is a good guy, and might make a decent long term boyfriend for Ilisa, but let's just go with Francisco and set up a dancing date. It'll be a lot more comic that way! I can see him getting drunk on the date already! We might have something to laugh about next week!


(I was right to like Rafael - he's winning 48% to Francisco's 41% at the time of posting. Nick gets 9% from all the people who clicked the wrong button first.)


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home